Dynamic Trilateral Leadership

One person's attempt to bring a better way of leading into the world

Why This Exists

▶

Video: Martin's Story

[Record your story here — see script below]

The honest version: I've spent years watching organizations make the same mistakes. Good people. Bad structures. I've seen what happens when one person carries too much, when dissent goes silent, when succession becomes impossible. This framework is my attempt to build something better. I don't know if it will work. But I have to try.
Triangles hold their shape under pressure. Human systems should learn from the strongest structures we already know.

Following the Journey

This isn't a polished launch. This is a public experiment. I'm documenting the journey — the wins, the rejections, the lessons — as it happens. Follow along if you're curious, if you're skeptical, or if you want to try this yourself.

0 people following this journey
[Update this manually or connect to email list]
June 2026

The Framework Takes Shape

After years of observing organizational dysfunction, I synthesize the core idea: triads as the minimum stable unit of leadership, with recorded dissent and dynamic authority. The name sticks: Dynamic Trilateral Leadership.

July 2026

Intellectual Lineage Documented

Researched the foundations: Simmel's triad theory (1890s), Social Trinitarians (Moltmann, Volf, LaCugna), Greenleaf's servant leadership. The pieces exist — the synthesis is new. Published the lineage honestly.

Now

Seeking Pilot Organizations

Current challenge: Finding 2-3 organizations willing to test this unproven framework. No track record yet. Just an idea and honest documentation. Looking for brave leaders.

[Coming]

First Pilot Begins

First organization implements a triad. We'll document what breaks, what works, what surprises us. Decision logs will be published (with permission).

[Coming]

University Partnership?

Exploring research partnerships — PhD students, grant applications, empirical validation. Academic credibility could help adoption.

[Coming]

First Public Case Study

After 3-6 months of pilot data, publish the first real case study. Not theory — actual results, actual lessons.

[Coming]

Open-Source Release

Full framework released under CC BY-NC 4.0. Free for anyone to use. Implementation guides, templates, training materials all public.

Want to see something on this timeline? Disagree with the approach? Follow along and tell me what you think.

The Framework (Brief Version)

Dynamic Trilateral Leadership is an organizational structure where all significant decisions are made by three-person cells with recorded dissent, dynamic authority based on competence rather than title, and AI as advisory only.

1. The Triad

No person should lead alone. Three people — small enough for accountability, large enough for disagreement.

2. 2/3 Voting + Dissent

Unanimity preferred. 2/3 proceeds. Dissent is recorded and travels with the decision.

3. Dynamic Authority

Authority shifts based on proximity to facts, track record, vindicated dissent — not static title.

4. AI Advisory Only

AI recommends. Humans decide. Everything logged. Responsibility stays human.

Read Full Documentation (Coming Soon)

Follow the Journey

I'm sharing this journey publicly — the progress, the setbacks, the lessons. If you're curious, skeptical, or want to learn from the experiment, follow along.

No spam. Occasional updates on the journey. Unsubscribe anytime.

Join the Pilot

Following is great. Piloting is better. If you lead an organization (church, nonprofit, Christian business) and you're willing to test this framework, let's talk.

What you're signing up for: This is unproven. You're not adopting a polished system — you're helping build one. 3-month minimum commitment. Monthly check-ins. Honest feedback required.

Questions? Challenges? Ideas?

This isn't a monologue. If you see holes in the framework, better ways to test it, or organizations I should approach — tell me.

Email: YOUR_EMAIL

I read every message. I can't promise to respond to all of them, but I do read them all.